Both Cryptomator and Boxcryptor are client-side robust encryption applications. However, the distinction goes beyond “free” versus “premium.”
You’ll learn about the advantages and disadvantages of each method in this comparative analysis.
When protecting your data from cyber-attacks and removing the bulk of the risk of putting it on “the cloud,” encryption is crucial.
However, Cryptomator and Boxcryptor are two of the most popular data encryption tools. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the features, benefits, and capabilities of Cryptomator and Boxcrypter.
Why Encrypt Files Stored in the Cloud?
On servers rather than devices, data is preserved in the cloud. In recent years, the method has become more popular for storing and disseminating information, but there are other issues to consider.
For instance, it’s possible that:
- The cloud storage service provider may have been hacked. Even though it’s infrequent, it’s still possible that a third-party data storage service may be hacked.
- An employee might try to get their hands on your files. Again, protections are typically in place to prevent this, but it is not entirely implausible.
- While in transit, the information might be compromised. Your data may be taken from your device to the cloud storage server even if the cloud service provider is secure,
Cloud storage encryption, commonly known as “client-side encryption,” has a primary benefit: only authorized users with decryption keys may access the encrypted information. Even companies that provide cloud storage (such as Google Drive, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, and others) cannot access the information you save there.
Cryptomator – DIY, Free & Open Source
Open-source disc encryption software, Cryptomator is supported by contributions and is free to use.
Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS are all supported platforms.
Pros and Cons
Why is Cryptomator so popular? There are several explanations.
Furthermore, as previously said, this software may be modified and accessed from a wide range of devices, including smartphones, thanks to its open-source nature. To top it all off, they are free to use and have detailed online tutorials.
The software has a few flaws, but they aren’t significant.
Due to the lack of file sharing and customer service features, it’s not the best solution for big organizations. If you are concerned about the security of your private information, this may be good news.
Boxcryptor – Managed, Supported, and NOT Free
Boxcryptor is comparable to Cryptomator, but it offers a broader range of features and is easier to use than Cryptomator. However, you will have to pay a small price for all of this as a consumer.
Read more: The Fall Of TrueCrypt And Rise Of VeraCrypt.
Pros and Cons
Boxcryptor technology has further advantages. It may be used for both personal and business purposes. You may use this tool to protect your data using two-factor authentication if you feel it is necessary.
Anyone who attempts to access the data using the password will also be required to receive a randomized 6-digit code through email or phone before they can log in.
Even if Boxcryptor may seem better than Cryptomator, there are still several drawbacks.
It’s not accessible unless you require special features like filename encryption, email support, or unfettered device access, which Boxcryptor doesn’t provide by default.
You may pay $48 per year ($108 for three years) for personal use or $96 per year ($216 for three years) for business use if you want to subscribe to the “for people” version.
Cryptomator vs. Boxcryptor | Does it matter which we use?
When comparing Cryptomator vs. Boxcryptor, the core qualities of both encryption software are similar, but the execution of these capabilities varies greatly.
In terms of device and storage support, Cryptomator is extremely limited. This software can still be accessed via the primary cloud services such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive but only through specific online storage based on these services.
Boxcryptor’s device and storage compatibility ranges are far more comprehensive than its competitors. Egnyte, Amazon S3, and SpiderOak One are already compatible with the software. – In addition, the software may operate on Android and iOS devices’ built-in storage systems.
After encrypting and decrypting the data, Cryptomator sends it to a secure storage vault.
To utilize this storage, Cryptomator will keep track of a specific location and use it to analyze files. Remember that any changes you make to a single file in Cryptomator will affect the whole vault.
A Boxcryptor-encrypted file is then stored in a crucial vault. Users can alter the content of only one file without impacting the integrity of the others since these files are encrypted sequentially.
Other users may access encrypted files if the Cryptomator user gives them the password, despite the absence of legal file-sharing options. Using this approach is risky if the password is lost or stolen.
Boxcryptor is more accessible to other users since they can use their account credentials to access files from the software. External users will be sent a link to the files through email, along with instructions on downloading and setting up Boxcryptor.
Because Cryptomator doesn’t support two-factor authentication, users who share their passwords risk being intercepted. No one can stop cyber criminals from stealing private information from a Cryptomator user’s password.
When logging onto Boxcryptor, users aren’t obligated to utilize two-factor authentication every time they log in. Vernam-cipher-based one-time pad (OTP) authentication is compatible with any authenticator tool that supports the Vernam-cipher